Adam Schiff Could Be In Deep Trouble – His Own Committee Just Admitted They Doctored The Meadows-Jordan Text
Corrupt Shifty Schiff has been caught lying again, altering evidence presented to congress, no less . . .
By Adam Casalino | December 15, 2021
SHARE
What’s Happening:
You probably remember Adam Schiff, right? Old “Pencil Neck” was one of the top Democrats trying to take down Trump during the left’s first botched impeachment probe. He wrecked his own reputation, though, when he claimed he had “evidence” that Trump colluded with Russia. As it turns out, he had nothing of the sort.
Guess what? Schiff is at it again. Apparently, he didn’t learn the last time. Big surprise, he is a top Democrat running Pelosi’s pathetic J6 commission. He claimed he had text messages between Republicans that could have put Trump in hot water. But now, both Schiff and his own committee are admitting they doctored the messages.
From The Federalist:
Not only did Schiff lie about the substance of the text message and its source, but he even doctored the message and graphic that he displayed on screen during his statement. The full text message, which was forwarded to Meadows from Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, on the evening of Monday, Jan. 5, was significantly longer than what Schiff read and put on screen, but Schiff erased significant portions of the text and added punctuation where there was none to give the impression that Jordan himself was tersely directing Meadows to give orders to Pence on how to handle the electoral vote certification.
And then they confessed it. From The Federalist:
In a statement provided to The Federalist via email, a Democrat spokesman for the Jan. 6 committee confessed that the committee doctored the text message…
“In the graphic, the period at the end of that sentence was added inadvertently,” the spokesman admitted. “The Select Committee is responsible for and regrets the error.”
Wow. How many times are Democrats going to get caught blatantly lying to the public and get away with it? Apparently, Schiff presented a text message between Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows. He showed a graphic of the message to the J6 committee. It looked pretty damning.
Then it came out that the message and information were doctored by Schiff’s team. They cut it off and left out the important context.
Of course, once they were found out, this group claimed it was an “error.” Really? You’re supposedly investigating a former president, claiming he was behind the events of January 6—and you just happened to make an “error” that distorts the entire investigation?
And they wonder why neither Trump nor his people are willing to appear before this “commission.” Because it appears that whenever this group of Democrats gets their hands on evidence, they deliberately distort it. Why should Trump or anyone cooperate with people who are clearly out to get them?
For that matter, why isn’t this “commission” being run by non-partisan, independent investigators? Why didn’t the House hire real prosecutors, lawyers, and investigators to get to the bottom of J6? Why did they choose to handle it themselves, when the fact they are from the opposing party creates an obvious conflict of interest?
Now that Schiff has been caught doctoring evidence, should he still be part of this commission? Imagine if a prosecutor in a criminal case was founding doctoring evidence? Not only would he be kicked from the case, but he might face charges himself.
So, when is Schiff going to face the music?
Key Takeaways:
Adam Schiff was caught doctoring text messages used in the J6 commission.
His own team admitted to it, claiming it was an “error.”
Schiff was caught repeatedly lying and misrepresenting evidence in previous “investigations.”
Source: The Federalist, The Federalist
SHARE
Adam Casalino
Adam Casalino is a freelance writer, cartoonist, and graphic designer. He is a regular contributor for the Patriot Journal. Find his other work: www.talesofmaora.com
Ineptocracy
A system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.