Biden Lies About Omicron And Other Historical Concerns
Just keeping up with all the lies and misinformation . . . Someone's got to make a record for his legacy . . .
President Joe Biden isn’t the most honest man that’s ever been in the White House, but some of the things Biden says are dangerously inaccurate.
Some of Biden’s recent lies include, “I’ve been against that war in Afghanistan from the very beginning,” “I used to drive a tractor-trailer. I only did it for part of summer.” One of the more critical economic lies was “The number of small businesses is up 30% compared to before the pandemic.”
If you can stand in front of the entire country and demonize “false narratives” about one thing while lying about other things, then you don’t deserve the position you hold.
When asked why it took so long to ramp up testing, Biden responded, “Well, what took so long is, it didn’t take very long at all. What happened was that the Omicron virus propagated faster than anyone expected. If I had told you weeks ago that this would expand by 50, 100, 200, or 500 percent daily, I think you would have looked at me and said, ‘Biden, what are you drinking?’”
Hopefully, the same thing Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is drinking.
Seriously though, it’s impressive how Biden thinks the American people are dumb. A month ago, the World Health Organization reported on Omicron and found it here as an update, not the first report. There was time to start preparing better, but Omicron isn’t nearly as deadly as the other variants, with an overall survivability rate of 98.5%. So, what are we even talking about?
Recent evidence suggests that Omicron spreads fast, is less severe, and leaves more quickly than the other COVID-19 variants. That will be a good thing because natural antibody response in many people will create a herd immunity structure that should provide safety for millions of people.
https://congressionalpost.com/biden-lies-about-omicron-and-other-historical-concerns/
Ineptocracy
A system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.