Fani Willis offered plea deals to Trump co-defendants to keep her prosecution plan for former president secret
This corrupt prosecutor is offering Trump's co-defendants such easy plea deals that is promoting their lying in order to save themselves. Her itarget is Trump but she needs witnesses willing to lie.
BY STAFF WRITERS | OCTOBER 22, 2023 |
Fani Willis has reportedly secured plea deals with Sidney Powell and Kenneth Chesebro, preventing a glimpse into her prosecution strategy against former President Donald Trump.
In a recent development, the Daily Caller reported that Willis, the Fulton County, Georgia district attorney, managed to keep her prosecution strategy against former President Donald Trump under wraps.
This was achieved when two key co-defendants, Powell and Chesebro, accepted plea deals just before their trial was set to commence.
Willis' strategic move to protect her case
These plea deals came as a significant relief for Willis. Had the trial proceeded, it would have given members of Trump's defense team an opportunity to preview some of the evidence she planned to present in the case against their client. The plea deals, therefore, prevented what legal experts refer to as a "free look" into her prosecution strategy.
Philip Holloway, a Georgia-based criminal defense attorney, mentioned that Willis was keen on avoiding the October trial. She did not want to disclose her strategy, especially to primary defendants including Trump and Rudy Giuliani.
William A. Jacobson, a professor at Cornell Law School, emphasized the significance of this move. He stated that if Chesebro's trial had taken place, it would have been the first instance in which a prosecutor would have to prove their case against Trump, rather than just making allegations.
Focus remains on former president
While some believe that the prosecution's acceptance of plea deals might indicate the overcharging of defendants, the primary focus remains on Trump. Jacobson highlighted that his prosecution and conviction are the state's main objectives.
These plea deals have more implications than just protecting Willis' strategy. They have also allowed the prosecution to secure potential witnesses for the case. One such significant witness could be Powell, given her involvement in several meetings with other charged individuals.
John Malcolm of the Heritage Foundation pointed out that Powell and another co-defendant, Scott Hall, received favorable plea agreements. They pleaded to misdemeanors, which will be expunged from their records once their probation ends. On the other hand, Chesebro pleaded guilty to a felony.
Implications for other co-defendants
Philip Holloway shed light on the implications of these plea deals for other co-defendants. He mentioned that some defense lawyers believe that these charges can be contested and won. However, Willis has been proactive in reaching out to other co-defendant's defense teams, offering plea deals in recent weeks.
Holloway also highlighted the financial strain on many of these defendants. The complexity and cost of such litigation make it challenging for them to continue fighting the charges, especially when they lack substantial resources.
The Daily Caller News Foundation reached out to Willis for a comment, but there was no immediate response.
Conclusion and reflections
As the case unfolds, several aspects become clear:
Fani Willis is determined to keep her prosecution strategy against Donald Trump confidential.
The plea deals with Sidney Powell and Kenneth Chesebro have prevented a potential preview of her case against him.
While some co-defendants have accepted plea deals, the focus remains on prosecuting the former president.
Financial constraints and the complexity of the case might push more co-defendants towards accepting plea deals.
Tired of missing the real news? Tired of censorship? Tired of our corrupt liberal mainstream press that only shows you what they want you to see? Subscribe to Ineptocracy Chronicles today and get the other side of the real news in your inbox daily. It’s free.
Ineptocracy
A system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers
.