Researchers Review COVID Database, Make a Huge Discovery When They Exclude Vaccinated People
If you posted that natural immunity was much better and longer lasting than the vaccine against COVID infections, you would have been censored and subject to hate mail . . . The left is corrupt.
By Jack Davis November 29, 2021 at 5:10am
A new study touts the power of natural immunity to fight off the worst effects of the coronavirus.
The researchers, who reported their results last week in the New England Journal of Medicine, examined 353,326 COVID-19 patients in the Arabian Peninsula nation of Qatar who were infected anywhere between Feb. 28, 2020, and April 28, 2021.
The research excluded about 87,500 people who were vaccinated over the time span of the study.
Out of the rest of the group studied, only 1,304 contracted COVID-19 again, with none requiring intensive care treatment for the disease, formally known as SARS-CoV-2.
“In earlier studies, we assessed the efficacy of previous natural infection as protection against reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 as being 85 percent or greater,” the researchers, from Qatar’s National Study Group for COVID-19 Epidemiology, wrote.
Trending:
I Miss Melania: Jill Biden Unveils Horrible Christmas Decorations for White House
“Accordingly, for a person who has already had a primary infection, the risk of having a severe reinfection is only approximately 1 percent of the risk of a previously uninfected person having a severe primary infection.”
The researchers noted that the duration of natural immunity needs to be better understood.
Is the Biden administration really following the science on COVID-19?
“It needs to be determined whether such protection against severe disease at reinfection lasts for a longer period, analogous to the immunity that develops against other seasonal ‘common cold’ coronaviruses, which elicit short-term immunity against mild reinfection but longer-term immunity against more severe illness with reinfection,” the study said.
“If this were the case with SARS-CoV-2, the virus (or at least the variants studied to date) could adopt a more benign pattern of infection when it becomes endemic,” the study said.
The study noted that once-infected individuals have “90 percent lower odds of resulting in hospitalization or death than primary infections.”
“Four reinfections were severe enough to lead to acute care hospitalization. None led to hospitalization in an ICU, and none ended in death,” the study reported.
Related:
Obama and Fauci Visit Elementary School to Push Kids to Get Vaccinated
“Reinfections were rare and were generally mild, perhaps because of the primed immune system after primary infection.”
“When you have only 1,300 reinfections among that many people, and four cases of severe disease, that’s pretty remarkable,” said John Alcorn, an expert in immunology and professor of pediatrics at the University of Pittsburgh, according to CNN.
Alcorn was not part of the team that conducted the study.
One potential weak spot in the study, according to CNN: It was limited to citizens of Qatar, and might not be universally replicable.
Truth and Accuracy
Submit a Correction →
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
Tags:
More
Contributor, News
SummaryMoreRecentContactJack Davis is a freelance writer who joined The Western Journal in July 2015 and chronicled the campaign that saw President Donald Trump elected. Since then, he has written extensively for The Western Journal on the Trump administration as well as foreign policy and military issues.
Conversation
The Western Journal is pleased to bring back comments to our articles! Due to threatened de-monetization by Big Tech, we had temporarily removed comments, but we have now implemented a solution to bring back the conversation that Big Tech doesn't want you to have. If you have any problems using the new commenting platform, please contact customer support at commenting-help@insticator.com. Welcome back!
Ineptocracy
A system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.